QUALITATIVE RESEARCH CRITIQUE 1. Research Issue and Purpose What is the research question or issue of the referenced study? What is its purpose? (Sometimes ONLY the purpose is stated clearly and the question must be inferred from the introductory discus

QUALITATIVE RESEARCH CRITIQUE 1. Research Issue and Purpose What is the research question or issue of the referenced study? What is its purpose? (Sometimes ONLY the purpose is stated clearly and the question must be inferred from the introductory discussion of the purpose.) ????? 2. Researcher Pre-understandings Does the article include a discussion of the researcher’s pre-understandings? What does the article disclose about the researcher’s professional and personal perspectives on the research problem? ????? 3. Literature Review What is the quality of the literature review? Is the literature review current, relevant? Is there evidence that the author critiqued the literature or merely reported it without critique? Is there an integrated summary of the current knowledge base regarding the research problem, or does the literature review contain opinion or anecdotal articles without any synthesis or summary of the whole? (Sometimes the literature review is incorporated into the introductory section without being explicitly identified.) ????? 4. Theoretical or Conceptual Framework Is a theoretical or conceptual framework identified? If so, what is it? Is it a nursing framework or one drawn from another discipline? (Sometimes there is no explicitly identified theoretical or conceptual framework; in addition, many “nursing” research studies draw on a “borrowed” framework, e.g., stress, medical pathology, etc.) ????? 5. Participants Who were the participants? Is the setting or study group adequately described? Is the setting appropriate for the research question? What type of sampling strategy was used? Was it appropriate? Was the sample size adequate? Did the researcher stipulate that information redundancy was achieved? ????? 6. Protection of Human Research Participants What steps were taken to protect human research subjects? ????? 7. Research Design What was the design of the study? If the design was modeled from previous research or pilot studies, please describe. ????? 8. Data Collection/Generation Methods What methods were used for data collection/generation? Was triangulation used? ????? 9. Credibility Were the generated data credible? Explain your reasons. ????? 10. Data Analysis What methods were used for data analysis? What evidence was provided that the researcher’s analysis was accurate and replicable? ????? 11. Findings What were the findings? ????? 12. Discussion of Findings Was the discussion of findings related to the framework? Were those the expected findings? Were they consistent with previous studies? Were serendipitous (i.e., accidental) findings described? ????? 13. Limitations Did the researcher report limitations of the study? (Limitations are acknowledgments of internal characteristics of the study that may help explain insignificant and other unexpected findings, and more importantly, indicate those groups to whom the findings CANNOT be generalized or applied. It is a fact that all studies must be limited in some way; not all of the issues involved in a problem situation can be studied all at once.) ????? 14. Implications Are the conclusions and implications drawn by the author warranted by the study findings? (Sometimes researchers will seem to ignore findings that don’t confirm their expectations as they interpret the meaning of their study findings.) ????? 15. Recommendations Does the author offer legitimate recommendations for further research? Is the description of the study sufficiently clear and complete to allow replication of the study? (Sometimes researchers’ recommendations seem to come from “left field” rather than following obviously from the discussion of findings. If a research problem is truly significant, the results need to be confirmed with additional research; in addition, if a reader wishes to design a study using a different sample or correcting flaws in the original study, a complete description is necessary.) ????? 16. Research Utilization in Your Practice How might this research inform your practice? Are the research findings appropriate to your practice setting and situation? What further research or pilot studies need to be done, if any, before incorporating findings into practice to assure both safety and effectiveness? How might the utilization of this research trigger changes in other aspects of practice?


Get Homework Help from Tutors Now!

Related Posts

• »Select An Ethical Dilemma Related To Health Policy From The Categories Of Moral Values, Professional Regulation, Health Of Individuals In Society, Or Distributive Justice. What Are The Controversies Surrounding This Issue?
• »Evaluating Organizational Change
• »Scholarly Activities
• »Quality Improvement and Patient Safety Initiatives
• »What is Confirmatory Data Analysis? Explain how it is Used in Confirmatory and Exploratory Data Analysis
• »Interprofessional Organanizational And Systems Leadership
• »Evidence-Based Practice Guideline
• »Experimental research involves a variable that can be manipulated. With this type of experiment, participants can be randomly assigned to either the control group or treatment group. It often demonstrate a cause-and-effect relationship
• »Overview of Compliance Plans
• »Communicate therapeutically with patients
• »Assessment Context
• »Individual Client Health History and Examination
• »Develop A Professional Product To Improve Care Or The Patient Experience Related To The Identified Health Problem With A 2-4 Page Summary Of Intervention Findings, Evidence, And Best-Practice Basis For The Professional Product.
• »Discussion - Political Issues For Nursing
• »discusses Leininger's Sunrise Model of transcultural nursing
• »The final project for NSG6101 consists of the development of a novel research proposal specific to your role specialization
• »Spirituality as a Predictive Factor for Signing an Organ Donor Card
• »Review the Patient Satisfaction Survey.
• »Compare and contrast two change theories, and determine which theory makes the most sense for implementing your specific EBP project. Why?
• »Your journal draws from evidence, concepts, and/or theories you have examined in this program, especially those related to your specialization. What have you observed during your Practicum Experience that you would like to analyze through your journal wri
• »Work Environment Assessment
• »Effective Approaches In Leadership And Management
• »executive summary analyzing the financial and regulatory impact of organizational compliance with your chosen measure
• »MyPlate Diet Analysis
• »Theory Power Point Presentation
• »Ethical Decision Making: The American Nurses Association
• »I will be using a quantitative approach for my evidence-based proposal. I believe that this approach will bethe best choice in identifying the needed information and measuring the strengths and preferences of myresearch that may suggest a result or will n
• »Exercise an understanding of basic communication theory and the appropriate use of communication technology. Analyze healthcare situations and choose the most effective way to communicate with the audience.
• »Kristen Swanson’s Theory of Caring,
• »evaluate quantitative research questions and hypotheses in assigned journal articles in your discipline and consider the alignment of theory, problem, purpose, research questions and hypotheses, and design.

Why Choose Us

1. Confidentiality and Privacy
2. 100% Original Work
3. 24/7 Customer Support
4. Unlimited Free Revisions
5. Experienced Writers
6. Real-time Communication
7. Affordable Prices
8. Deadline Guaranteed