Promoting Healthcare Quality

Quality improvement defines the distinct systematic and continuous acts that lead to a measurable amount of growth in both the healthcare services and the health status of targeted patient groups. One of the primary aims of a quality improvement plan lies with assisting the providers into self-assessing their performance that is in the delivery of quality education and care, together with being able to plan for future enhancements (Jackson, 2011). According to the study undertaken by the Institute of Medicine, the central claim lies from the majority of the medical errors that come about due to faulty processes and faulty systems and not individuals. The Processes that can be termed as being inefficient, variable, have different provider education and experience add up to the complexity that applies to healthcare. It is also essential in this case to bring into perspective IOM assertion of the current healthcare industry functioning at a lower level than what it should be, which brings the six aims of health care that is; effective, patient-centred, safe, efficient, timely and equitable. The objectives of safety and effectiveness are each illustrated through the process-of-care measures and evaluating whether the health providers are capable of performing the processes that have been demonstrated to get the necessary needs and consequently avoid the operations that are aimed to harm. The actual goal of having to measure the quality of healthcare lies with being able to determine the influence that healthcare carries on the desired outcomes together with evaluating the level to which healthcare can adhere to the specific processes on the basis of scientific evidence or rather the agreement through professional consensus which needs to be consistent with the patient references. Because is either system or process failures cause errors, it is essential to adapt to the various process-improvement methods to look into the different inefficacies, preventable errors and ineffective care that will help effect change that is related to the systems Measures and Indicators of Performance related to the Quality Improvement Issue The type of effort that is put in order to improve quality needs to be measured, and this is to demonstrate on whether the improvement strategies lead to change with a particular endpoint into the desired direction, what should be done in this case is contribute to the unintended results that showcase itself in different areas of the system with added efforts put in place to ensure that the process id brought back to acceptable ranges. The idea that plays a role in measuring for quality improving lies with the thought that excellent performance is a reflection of good quality practice and the comparisons of performance with the providers and the organization will help add onto the better performance. Over the past few years, there has been an increase in both the measuring and the reporting of performance for the healthcare systems and processes. Whereas public reporting of execution being used in identifying the sections that need improvement and ascribe several national providers, in this case, have been sensitive to the comparative performance of information published. The kind of complexity that underlies healthcare systems together with the delivery of services has the capacity of enhancing the difficulty in measuring quality. The underlying challenge in using the measures of healthcare is the attribution variability that is related to high-level cognitive reasoning and problem solving (Wallin, Bostrom, Wikblad, 2013). Methods for Gathering and accessing current quantitative and qualitative data Some of the techniques applied in gathering and evaluating the existing qualitative and quantitative data are; the plan-to-do-study act and six sigma. The plan-to-do-study act for one represents a method that has been broadly used in matters concerning rapid cycle improvement. The topmost feature of this technique lies with the fact that it has a cyclical nature of impacting and also assessing change, which is accomplished through small PSDAs, this is before the changes are made system-wide. The primary purpose of this method is to assist in the creation of a functional and casual relationship with the changes in the processes. Six Sigma, on the other hand, consists of designing, improving and monitoring the process to minimize waste while being able to optimize both satisfaction and financial stability. The real performance of a method is applied to measure improvement purposefully through comparing the baseline of the process capability right before improvement. This is with the procedure capability after looking into the potential solutions for quality improvement. Gap Analysis for World Health Organization Carrying out a gap analysis is a vital part of each organization, and in order for it to work then the organization needs to agree on the corporate performance indicators, in the case for WHO the signs for the overall organizational performance needs to be traceable through a diverse range of business performance metrics, which comes in the form of cause and effect relationship also referred to as the value driver tree (Lynn, Baily, Bottrell, 2007). There is also the need for sound information that reflects on the results measured through critical performance indicators used within the World Health Organization. An essential part of this analysis lies in asking the right questions and measuring and interpreting the difference between the two. The first one includes understanding that for world health organization this gap analysis needs targets to be set and when doing the gap evaluation it is crucial to make forecasts. The occurring difference between these two is as a result of the gap to be closed through changes to strategies. References Jackson S. (2011) successfully implementing total quality management tools within healthcare: what are the key actions? Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 14(4):157–63 Lynn J, Baily MA, Bottrell M. (2007) The ethics of using quality improvement methods in health care. Ann Intern Med;146:666–73 Wallin L, Bostrom AM, Wikblad K. (2013) Sustainability in changing clinical practice promotes evidence-based nursing care. J Adv Nurs. 1(5):509–18

Promoting Healthcare Quality

Promoting Healthcare Quality is rated 4.8/5 based on 160 customer reviews.

Are you in need of homework help?
Place your order and get 100% original work.




Get Homework Help Now



Related Posts

Why Choose Us
  1. Confidentiality and Privacy
  2. 100% Original Work
  3. 24/7 Customer Support
  4. Unlimited Free Revisions
  5. Experienced Writers
  6. Real-time Communication
  7. Affordable Prices
  8. Deadline Guaranteed