Critiquing Health-related information with the HON Code Criteria and Fry Readability Scale
Critiquing Health-related information with the HON Code Criteria and Fry Readability Scale Name: _________________________________ Part I: HON Code Criteria 1. Visit the Hon-Code website: http://www.hon.ch/HONcode/Conduct.html 2. Identify one health related website and list the URL where you found the siteName of the site you are evaluating | |
URL |
Directions: Indicate yes or no regarding your evaluation of the site in relationship to meeting the identified criteria, and then provide rationale using examples from the site to support your answer. | ||
1. Authoritative (2 points) Indicate the qualifications of the authors Explain: | YES | NO |
2. Complementarity (2 points) Information should support, not replace, the doctor-patient relationship Explain: | YES | NO |
3. Privacy (2 points) Respect the privacy and confidentiality of personal data submitted to the site by the visitor Explain: | YES | NO |
4. Attribution (2 points) Cite the source(s) of published information, date medical and health pages Explain: | YES | NO |
5. Justifiability (2 points) Site must back up claims relating to benefits and performance Explain: | YES | NO |
6. Transparency (2 points) Accessible presentation, accurate email contact Explain: | YES | NO |
7. Financial disclosure (2 points) Identify funding sources Explain: | YES | NO |
8. Advertising policy (2 points) Clearly distinguish advertising from editorial content Explain: | YES | NO |
9. Your recommendation of the site. (1 point) Explain: | A. Quality Site B. Use with Caution C. Do not Use |
10. What is the name of the brochure? What grade level is the brochure written? (2 points) | |
11. Would you consider the brochure appropriate for patient education? (1 point) |
Critiquing Health-related information with the HON Code Criteria and Fry Readability Scale is rated 4.8/5 based on 779 customer reviews.
Are you in need of homework help?
Place your order and get 100% original work.
Get Homework Help Now
Related Posts
- »Overview: Synthesis Paper
- »Assessment Of The Abdomen And The Gastrointestinal System
- »The focus of this week’s assignment is identifying research components. You will be responsible for reviewing two articles (listed below) and completing the following tasks for each one
- »Prevention of Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections
- »Medication Safety Project
- »Epidemic In The Community
- »Discussion: Improving Quality
- »Medical Case Study
- »Community Assessment and Analysis Presentation
- »Competitiveness And Performance Effectiveness For Health Care IT Systems
- »Discussion
- »· Consider what physical exams and diagnostic tests would be appropriate to gather more information about the patient’s condition. How would the results be used to make a diagnosis?
- »apply lessons in quality improvement in nursing to a real-world nursing issue
- »Discussion: The Role Of The RN/APRN In Politic Making
- »Discuss the history of present illness that you would take on this patient in preparation for the clinic visit
- »Assignment:Academic Success And Professional Development Plan
- »Data Analysis And Results
- »Create a one-page patient education tool that explains usage of a medication and factors that can affect outcomes
- »Defining Quality
- »Discuss The Difference Between An Exploratory Analysis And A Confirmatory
- »Understanding Electronic Orders and Creating Problem Lists
- »Discuss the concept of life review. What are the goals and benefits of a life review? How is life review similar and different than ordinary remembering?
- »Quantitative and Qualitative Research Critique
- »Statistical Analysis Report
- »The Spirit Catches You and You Fall Down
- »What are the roles of the following groups in the health care value improvement process: boards of directors, senior leaders, physicians, employees, and payers?
- »Group Presentation
- »Environmental Factors And Health Promotion: Accident Prevention And Safety Promotion For Parents And Caregivers Of Infants
- »Case Study Assignment: Assessing Neurological.
- »Respond on two different days by making recommendations for how they might strengthen the leadership behaviors profiled in their CliftonStrengths Assessment, or by commenting on lessons to be learned from the results that can be applied to personal leader
Why Choose Us
- Confidentiality and Privacy
- 100% Original Work
- 24/7 Customer Support
- Unlimited Free Revisions
- Experienced Writers
- Real-time Communication
- Affordable Prices
- Deadline Guaranteed